Top 10 SEO Myths
By Howard Farmer • Oct 1st, 2008 • Category: Lead Story, SEO AdviceThere are so many myths about SEO Advice that we hope to elucidate and clarify so called SEO myths below …..
1. SEO is about secret strategies
There is a SEO myth that there are secret strategies and methods employed by SEO experts that result in top SERPs (search engine result pages). Of course, this is bunkum although there are “consultants” who might like to suggest otherwise. There are rigorous methods and techniques that need to be followed but the information is widely available. “Secrets” tend to be used by “Black Hat” webmasters who by necessity need to maintain a wall of silence!
2. Keyword Density is critical
In the early days of “SEO” there was some truth in a magic keyword density formula. The search engines have evolved and are well aware of pages stuffed with keywords. Although it is essential to add keyword phrases to a page, there is no magic percentage. The page should be natural and be designed for the reader rather than the search engine.
3. Content, Content, Content
Although content is essential for a website, content alone will not achieve high SERPs. There are other factors at work that must be considered. Bear in mind that there are over 100 factors in the Google algorithm (and other search engines will also have equally complex formulae for working out rankings). ONE of the pre-requisites is good unique content – but NOT the ONLY factor.
4. Submitting Sites to Search Engines
This myth is probably a hangover from the past when this technique did have some effect. Do not bother to submit to search engines, instead concentrate on getting a good quality link(s) from a relevant website. This “recommendation” will not only alert the Search engines of the new site but also help in getting higher SERPs. Top Tip: Do not keep submitting your site to the search engines – this is unnecessary and some “gurus” suggest that you can get penalised.
5. Guaranteed Rankings / SERPs
“We can guarantee you top SERPs” – this is just not true for competitive keyword phrases. Yes, it is possible to suggest you can get top rankings for “large fat blue monkeys are rare” (on an exact match) as there is NO competition. It is important to choose keyword phrases that you want to rank for carefully – for example, will they bring the type of enquiries you want? Are they “info” related enquiries or “buy” enquiries? This is a topic on its own!
Whilst talking about this myth – also bear in mind it is impossible to guarantee that SERPs will remain constant. So a #1 ranking today cannot be guaranteed tomorrow!
6. Links for top SERPs
Links WILL help but it is just ONE of those 100 factors. A link from any site may NOT be a good link. A link from what Google defines as a “bad neighborhood” can adversely affect your site. Google does not clarify a “bad neighborhood” but perhaps they are referring to adult, gambling, racist, etc. sites. Links should be from sites that share your theme; do not accept links from link or resource pages – they have little value especially if the external links on the page are to all different themes. Do you really think Google cannot spot a link or resource page?
Do NOT use services that will provide instant linking to 100s of sites. It will raise a flag with Google. Your linking strategy should be planned and be naturally progressive. Check all sites carefully before linking to them – remember your link is perceived as a recommendation. If you start recommending bad sites what does that say about YOUR site?
What is Important: Be extremely careful NOT to link from your site to BAD neighborhoods. Google encourages you to link (recommend) to other sites providing the content is relevant.
Concentrate on getting quality links from Authority sites on your theme!
7. WSC Validation required
In an ideal world it would be nice to have every page on your site validated by WSC. However, unless you have a very diligent webmaster it is an impossible task! It is not essential that every page is validated from a SEO perspective. However, what IS important is that the search engine robots can parse your page(s). If they cannot read a page, then the page will not be included in the index – worse still links on that page may not be followed. The Lynx viewer and search engine simulator are useful tools for checking what is seen by the search bots.
8. Search Engines prefer static to dynamic pages
In the bad old days dynamic pages that were accessed with urls such as www.mydomain.com/link.php?action=view&var=new&country=europe were bad news as the search spiders did not know how to follow these links with “?” in them. The result was that dynamic pages were not accessed and indexed. However, those days are gone. Google says “We can crawl dynamic URLs and interpret the different parameters. We might have problems crawling and ranking your dynamic URLs if you try to make your urls look static and in the process hide parameters which offer the Googlebot valuable information. One recommendation is to avoid reformatting a dynamic URL to make it look static.”
9. Meta Tags are important
Meta tags were used extensively in the past but again search engines have evolved. It is the content and structure of the page that is important for SEO purposes. A common technique was to stuff the “keyword” tag with an endless list of keywords and phrases – do this at your peril! The title is relatively important as Google uses it to display in their SERPs (and the description is often used too). So the “title” and “description” should sell your website. Get the user to click! Google likes your titles and descriptions to be unique. Use your main keywords in <title> and H1.
10. High Page Rank required for good SERPs
Google publishes a historic version (up to 3 to 4 months old typically) of your page rank for every page on your site. This is NOT necessarily the current page rank of the page – it is re-calculated on a frequent basis (daily?). It is perfectly possible for pages with low page rank to get top SERPs as there are other factors deciding the SERPs.
Howard Farmer - over 20 years of IT experience with IBM, Lotus, GE and Ameridata.Email this author | All posts by Howard Farmer














Palapple Blog | SEO Solutions for your Business…
Thanks for sharing. Search engine optimization is indeed one of the most crucial areas in Internet marketing, it is a perfect bridge between technology and business….
Top 10 SEO Myths…
Google publishes a historic version (up to 3 to 4 months old typically) of your page rank for every page on your site. This is NOT necessarily the current page rank of the page – it is re-calculated on a frequent basis (daily?). ..%2…
Interesting post and I agree with some of what you said. I do believe that inbound links have more play in to the equation, personal opinion however you could be right.
I don’t agree in one point – “Search Engines prefer static to dynamic pages”. Google says recommendation: to avoid reformatting a dynamic URL to make it look static. But it’s not a proof that dynamic URL is as good as static. Google says also: “It’s always advisable to use static content with static URLs as much as possible, but in cases where you decide to use dynamic content, you should give us the possibility to analyze your URL”. You can give them possibility to analyze dynamic but static is “advisable” and again – it’s not a proof that dynamic URL is equivalent or better to static URL when it goes about SEO.
I’m with Mih, I won’t suggest that you reformat your old dynamic URL’s to newer static looking URL’s, but I would stress that you program any new projects with static looking URL’s. I don’t know anyone that can really argue that point.
PageRank… it’s so outdated by the time you do actually see it in the toolbar it’s pretty useless. I think PageRank is the greatest myth of the lot – but that’s a whole other discussion point.
I think anyone that thinks there is any single ranking factor however is a little mislead. While I don’t think one factor can make you (or break you) a well structured, focused and valuable site should always rank well.
I enjoyed reading the article. As well as being the 10 myths they are also the 10 strategies that many so called SEOs would implement. Sadly the standard of work that is being produced by many SEOs is pathetic, it is no wonder that the industry has such a bad reputation. I am not sure if this is down to laziness or lack of knowledge on the SEO part.
Andy Jenkins at StomperNet says:
Myth: Google Will Not Index “Dynamic” Pages
The REAL Truth: This myth, like many, was originally true to an extent, but we’ve since forgotten when and why it applied. Older search engines and even earlier versions of Google were resistant to indexing complex URLs — strings of query parameters and such — that were, and are, common with large, dynamic, websites. But dynamic or static doesn’t really matter: it’s the URLs!
Long ugly URLs will still sometimes create an indexing problem but Google has gotten far better at indexing query string URLs over the last couple years so it really is less of a problem than it once was.
Query strings are still not my favorite and if I had a time machine I would get them erased from time, but until then Google does index dynamic content quite regularly.
Thanks for sharing these SEO myths. I agree with all the points you have stated here.
Many people still believe that dynamic pages are not good for SEO. It’s an absolute myth, but for the sake of user i think static URL would make sense and improve CTR.
I have listed down my version of SEO myths here. I hope your readers would enjoy it.
http://www.retail-ecommerce.com/2009/03/seo-myths-and-misconceptions.html
Keep coming up with good post.