Many people still believe that dynamic pages are not good for SEO. It’s an absolute myth, but for the sake of user i think static URL would make sense and improve CTR.

I have listed down my version of SEO myths here. I hope your readers would enjoy it.
http://www.retail-ecommerce.com/2009/03/seo-myths-and-misconceptions.html

Keep coming up with good post.

Myth: Google Will Not Index “Dynamic” Pages

The REAL Truth: This myth, like many, was originally true to an extent, but we’ve since forgotten when and why it applied. Older search engines and even earlier versions of Google were resistant to indexing complex URLs — strings of query parameters and such — that were, and are, common with large, dynamic, websites. But dynamic or static doesn’t really matter: it’s the URLs!

Long ugly URLs will still sometimes create an indexing problem but Google has gotten far better at indexing query string URLs over the last couple years so it really is less of a problem than it once was.

Query strings are still not my favorite and if I had a time machine I would get them erased from time, but until then Google does index dynamic content quite regularly.

PageRank… it’s so outdated by the time you do actually see it in the toolbar it’s pretty useless. I think PageRank is the greatest myth of the lot – but that’s a whole other discussion point.

I think anyone that thinks there is any single ranking factor however is a little mislead. While I don’t think one factor can make you (or break you) a well structured, focused and valuable site should always rank well.

Google publishes a historic version (up to 3 to 4 months old typically) of your page rank for every page on your site. This is NOT necessarily the current page rank of the page – it is re-calculated on a frequent basis (daily?). ..%2…

Thanks for sharing. Search engine optimization is indeed one of the most crucial areas in Internet marketing, it is a perfect bridge between technology and business….